Macabacus Pricing (and a Cheaper Alternative)
Macabacus is priced per user per year. Its own pricing page has listed roughly $200 a year for the core tier and around $360 for the professional tier, and third-party resellers have quoted figures near $395 per seat. There is no free version. If that is more than a solo analyst, student, or boutique can justify, ModelMint covers the core auditing and cleanup work for $89 a year. Here is what each one costs and who should pick which.
What Macabacus Costs
Macabacus does not publish one flat public price for every plan. As listed on its pricing page, the core tier has run about $200 per user per year and the professional tier about $360, billed annually and per seat. Some third-party resellers have quoted higher numbers, near $395 per user. Prices change over time, so confirm the current figure on Macabacus's own site before you rely on it.
There is no free version. Full functionality is Windows-only; Macabacus on Mac is a reduced Lite build. The price buys a broad investment-banking toolkit, not just model auditing.
Macabacus vs ModelMint on Price
The two tools overlap on auditing and cleanup but aim at different jobs and different budgets.
| ModelMint | Macabacus | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual price | $89 per user | ~$200 to $360+ per user |
| Monthly option | $10 per month | Not publicly listed |
| Free version | no, cancel anytime | ✗ |
| Platform | Windows, Excel 2016+ | Windows full, Mac is Lite |
| Built for | Audit, clean, and ship models | Full IB suite plus PowerPoint and Word linking |
Macabacus figures are as listed by Macabacus and third-party resellers and can change. Confirm current pricing on their site.
Why Macabacus Costs More
Macabacus is a broad suite built for banking teams. You are paying for breadth: live Excel-to-PowerPoint and Word linking, deck and document automation, extensive formatting and charting, and a large library of shortcuts. For a desk that lives in pitch books, that breadth is worth the price.
If you do not need slide linking and a full banking toolkit, most of what you pay for goes unused. The auditing and cleanup work, the part a lot of analysts actually reach for day to day, is a smaller slice of the suite.
A Cheaper Alternative for Focused Auditing
ModelMint does the auditing, cleanup, and sharing subset and nothing else, for $89 a year or $10 a month. It traces formula precedents and dependents, finds hardcoded plugs, converts external workbook links to values, scrubs broken defined names, color-codes cells by role, and prepares and sends a clean workbook. It runs locally on Windows with no telemetry.
It is honest about the trade-off: ModelMint does not link Excel to PowerPoint or Word, and it is not a full banking suite. If model review and handoff are your real needs, you get them at a fraction of the cost.
Who Should Pick Which
Pick Macabacus if your firm needs PowerPoint and Word linking, deck automation, and a full banking toolkit, and the per-seat price fits your budget.
Pick ModelMint if you are a solo analyst, student, boutique, or freelancer who wants fast model auditing, cleanup, and safe sharing at a transparent low price, and you do not need slide linking.
Find Hardcodes
Surface the hardcoded plugs and constants buried in a model in seconds, then clean up and ship it, for $89 a year.
Get ModelMint See how it worksFAQ
How much does Macabacus cost?
Macabacus is priced per user per year. Its pricing page has listed roughly $200 a year for the core tier and about $360 for the professional tier, with some resellers quoting near $395 per seat. There is no free version. Confirm the current price on Macabacus's site, since it changes.
Is there a free version of Macabacus?
No. Macabacus does not offer a free tier. Full features are Windows-only, and the Mac build is a reduced Lite version.
What is the cheapest Macabacus alternative?
For the auditing, cleanup, and sharing part of the job, ModelMint is a focused alternative at $89 a year or $10 a month, a fraction of Macabacus's per-seat price. It does not include PowerPoint or Word linking, so it suits analysts who mainly need to review and ship models rather than build decks.